Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

ABC IP LLC v. Peak Tactical LLC, No. 26-1527 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 26-1527
Decided
September 15, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ABC IP LLC, RARE BREED TRIGGERS INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

PEAK TACTICAL LLC, DBA PARTISAN

TRIGGERS, NICHOLAS NORTON,

Defendants-Appellees

2026-1527

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming in No. 2:26-cv-00018-KHR, Chief Judge Kelly H. Rankin.

JUDGMENT

JOHN WINSTON THORNBURGH, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by CARL EDWARD BRUCE, MATT COLVIN, Dallas, TX; BENJAMIN JOSEPH CHRISTOFF, ELIZABETH DETORO, Washington, DC; JORY M. HOFFMAN, Chicago, IL; GLENN D. BELLAMY, Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP, Cincinnati, OH. TIMOTHY P. GETZOFF, Holland & Hart LLP, Boulder, CO, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by

2JEFFREY RANDALL ROESER; CHRISTOPHER M. JACKSON, PAUL DOUGLAS SWANSON, Denver, CO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

September 15, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

ABC IP LLC v. Peak Tactical LLC, No. 26-1527 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-26-1527-20260915
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-26-1527-20260915

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved September 15, 2026 · Report an error