Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Hovgaard, No. 26-145 (Fed. Cir. June 24, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 26-145
Decided
June 24, 2026
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit In re KIM ANTHONY HOVGAARD,

Petitioner 2026-145

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 26-2915, Judge Joseph L. Falvey, Jr.

ON PETITION AND MOTION

Before PROST, MAYER, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Kim Anthony Hovgaard petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to vacate a May 15, 2026, order granting the Secretary of Veterans Affairs an extension of time, declare

22 IN RE HOVGAARD

the Department of Veterans Affairs in default, and issue an immediate panel decision on his case. ECF No. 2 at 2.1

A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and may only issue if petitioner has shown a clear and indisputable right to relief and that there are no other adequate means to attain the relief desired. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004). Mr. Hovgaard has not met this demanding standard here at least because he has not shown that the normal appeal process is inadequate or that any delay in this matter is so egregious as to warrant mandamus relief. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for mandamus, ECF No. 2, is denied. (2) ECF No. 2 is unsealed. (3) All pending motions are denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

June 24, 2026 Date

Footnotes

  1. 1 Mr. Hovgaard’s petition also includes a conclusory request to seal this matter, but it provides no basis to do so.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Hovgaard, No. 26-145 (Fed. Cir. June 24, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-26-145-20260624
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-26-145-20260624

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.