Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Parker, No. 26-118 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 21, 2026)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 26-118
Decided
January 21, 2026
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

In Re DENNIS DONALD PARKER, SUSAN TILLER

PARKER,

Petitioners

2026-118

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in No. 3:25-cv-13057-DCC-KFM, Judge Donald C. Coggins, Jr.

ON PETITION AND MOTION

Before STOLL, WALLACH, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit

Judges.

O R D E R

Dennis Donald Parker and Susan Tiller Parker filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina over a mortgage dispute with private parties. After the assigned magistrate judge issued an order denying various relief and directing the Parkers to submit various forms, the Parkers petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus seeking equitable relief.

22 IN RE PARKER

The All Writs Act provides that the federal courts “may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.” 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). As that statute makes clear, however, the Act is not itself a grant of jurisdiction. See Clinton v. Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529, 534–35 (1999). Our jurisdiction to review decisions of the federal district courts extends only to patent cases, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to the district court from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, see id. § 1295(a)(4)(C); or certain damages claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in amount,” id. § 1346(a)(2), see id. § 1295(a)(2). This case clearly falls outside that jurisdiction, and therefore we dismiss. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is dismissed, and all pending motions are denied.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

January 21, 2026 Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Parker, No. 26-118 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 21, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-26-118-20260121
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-26-118-20260121

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.