Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Besang Inc. v. Micron Technology Inc., No. 26-1085 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 30, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 26-1085
Decided
October 30, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BESANG INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., MICRON

SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., MICRON

TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2026-1085

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:23-cv-00028-JRG-RSP, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

JUDGMENT

AISHA MAHMOOD HALEY, Caldwell Cassady Curry PC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by BRADLEY WAYNE CALDWELL, RICHARD A. COCHRANE, ROBERT SETH REICH, JR., JAMES F. SMITH; WARREN JOSEPH MCCARTY, III, Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing, PLLC, Dallas, TX. JOHN C. KAPPOS, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Dallas, TX,

2argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by TIMOTHY S. DURST, FRANCES MACKAY; BENJAMIN HABER, XIN-YI ZHOU, Los Angeles, CA; KHANH NGUYEN LEON, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

October 30, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Besang Inc. v. Micron Technology Inc., No. 26-1085 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 30, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-26-1085-20261030
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-26-1085-20261030

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved November 1, 2026 · Report an error