Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Yieldmo, Inc. v. Teads, Inc., No. 25-2012 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-2012
Decided
October 13, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

YIELDMO, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TEADS, INC., TEADS SA, TEADS SARL,

Defendants-Appellees

2025-2012

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:25-cv-00737-PAE, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.

JUDGMENT

C. GRAHAM GERST, Global IP Law Group, LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL HEALY. RYAN NEIL HAGGLUND, Loeb & Loeb LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by WILLIAM KRAMER, ALEXANDRA SCHALLER, Chicago, IL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, STOLL and

CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

October 13, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Yieldmo, Inc. v. Teads, Inc., No. 25-2012 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-25-2012-20261013
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-2012-20261013

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved October 13, 2026 · Report an error