Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Terracino v. Trimaco, Inc., No. 25-1808 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2026)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1808
Decided
November 10, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ROBERT TERRACINO, BRADIE TERRACINO,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

TRIMACO, INC., FKA TRIMACO, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2025-1808

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in No. 5:22-cv-00015-FL, Judge Louise Wood Flanagan.

JUDGMENT

DUNCAN G. BYERS, Byers Law, Williamsburg, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. DEBORAH POLLACK-MILGATE, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ALLEN ROBERT BAUM, Raleigh, NC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 10, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Terracino v. Trimaco, Inc., No. 25-1808 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1808-20261110
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1808-20261110

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.