Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Caddo Systems, Inc. v. Jetbrains Americas, Inc., No. 25-1764 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1764
Decided
September 11, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CADDO SYSTEMS, INC., 511 TECHNOLOGIES,

INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

JETBRAINS AMERICAS, INC., JETBRAINS, INC.,

JETBRAINS S.R.O.,

Defendants-Appellees

2025-1764

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:22-cv-01033-JLH-LDH, Judge Jennifer L. Hall.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH J. ZITO, DNL Zito, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by BENJAMIN CHARLES DEMING, Dallas, TX. AARON KAMLAY, Butzel Long, PC, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by PRIYA DALAL, DANIEL GEORGE VIVARELLI, JR.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST, Circuit

Judge, and BARKER, District Judge1).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

September 11, 2026

Date

Footnotes

  1. ↩ 1 Honorable J. Campbell Barker, District Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Caddo Systems, Inc. v. Jetbrains Americas, Inc., No. 25-1764 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1764-20260911
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1764-20260911

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved September 11, 2026 · Report an error