Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

WU v. Fujianshengfusixianshangmaoyouxiangongsi, No. 25-1698 (Fed. Cir. June 23, 2025)

Granted in Part
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1698
Decided
June 23, 2025
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ZHIHUA WU,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FUJIANSHENGFUSIXIANSHANGMAOYOUXIANGO NGSI, FUJIANPROVANCE 9457TRADING CO. LTD., QUANZHOUNUODAODIANZISHANGWUHEHUOQI

YE,

Defendants-Appellants

2025-1698

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:25-cv-01644, Judge Sunil R. Harjani.

ON MOTION

Before REYNA, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Appellants move to voluntarily dismiss their appeal and for the appellee to pay costs.

22 WU v. FUJIANSHENGFUSIXIANSHANGMAOYOUXIANGONGSI

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted only to the extent that the appeal is dismissed and each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 23, 2025 Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

WU v. Fujianshengfusixianshangmaoyouxiangongsi, No. 25-1698 (Fed. Cir. June 23, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1698-20250623
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1698-20250623

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error