Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Stewart v. State of Colorado, No. 25-1649 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 29, 2025)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1649
Decided
September 29, 2025
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CHRISTOPHER L. STEWART,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

STATE OF COLORADO,

Defendant-Appellee

2025-1649

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 1:24-cv-02159-LTB-RTG, Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock.

O R D E R

No party having filed a response to the court’s June 12, 2025 show cause order, we now dismiss.

Christopher L. Stewart filed a complaint against the State of Colorado in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado “seek[ing] a total of $1,500,000.00,” Dkt. No. 18 at 5, and asserting, among other things, civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 18, 2024, the district court entered judgment dismissing the case, denied Mr. Stewart leave to proceed in forma2 2 STEWART v. STATE OF COLORADO

pauperis on appeal, and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. On April 15, 2025, Mr. Stewart filed a notice of appeal seeking review in this court.

“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Here, Mr. Stewart’s notice of appeal, filed more than five months after the district court’s November 24, 2024 judgment, is untimely. For at least this reason, we and any other court of appeals lack jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

September 29, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Stewart v. State of Colorado, No. 25-1649 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 29, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1649-20250929
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1649-20250929

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.