Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Blaze Mobile, Inc., No. 25-1485 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 12, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1485
Decided
November 12, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE BLAZE MOBILE, INC.,

Appellant 2025-1485

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/019,135.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY J. GONSALVES, Law Office of Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee John A. Squires. Also represented by JUSTIN BOVA, NICHOLAS THEODORE MATICH, IV, ROBERT MCBRIDE, FAHD H. PATEL.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and STARK, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 12, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Blaze Mobile, Inc., No. 25-1485 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 12, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1485-20261112
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1485-20261112

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved November 12, 2026 · Report an error