Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co. Ltd., No. 25-1465 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1465
Decided
November 9, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE JIAXING SUPER LIGHTING ELECTRIC

APPLIANCE, CO., LTD.,

Appellant 2025-1465

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/015,003.

JUDGMENT

MARK A. HANNEMANN, Troutman Pepper Locke LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by NICHOLAS J. GALLO, Rochester, NY. FAHD H. PATEL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee John A. Squires. Also represented by NICHOLAS THEODORE MATICH, IV, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, PETER JOHN SAWERT.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 9, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co. Ltd., No. 25-1465 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1465-20261109
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1465-20261109

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved November 9, 2026 · Report an error