Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Digital Broadcasting Solutions, LLC v. Dish Network L.L.C., No. 25-1364 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2026)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1364
Decided
November 5, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit DIGITAL BROADCASTING SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

DISH NETWORK L.L.C., DISH TECHNOLOGIES

L.L.C.,

Cross-Appellants

2025-1364, 2025-1365, 2025-1430

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2023-00976, IPR2023-00977.

JUDGMENT

JOHN WITTENZELLNER, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by FRED WILLIAMS, Williams Simons and Landis PC, Austin, TX. ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Baker Botts LLP, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellants. Also represented by THOMAS B. CARTER, JR., Houston, TX; KURT M. PANKRATZ, Dallas, TX.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 5, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Digital Broadcasting Solutions, LLC v. Dish Network L.L.C., No. 25-1364 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1364-20261105
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1364-20261105

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.