Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Dodots Licensing Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 25-1263 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2026)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1263
Decided
September 15, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit DODOTS LICENSING SOLUTIONS LLC,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., APPLE INC.,

Appellees

2025-1263, 2025-1264, 2025-1265

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2023-00621, IPR2023-00701, IPR2023-00756, IPR2024-00143, IPR2024-00144, IPR2024-00145.

JUDGMENT

CHARLES E. FOWLER, JR., McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRANDON MERRILL, Dallas, TX. MICHAEL JOHN BALLANCO, Fish & Richardson P.C., Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellee Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. also represented by LAUREN ANN DEGNAN, IRENE HWANG, MICHAEL J. MCKEON, ADAM SHARTZER; JOSEPH RICHARD DORRIS, Atlanta, GA.

2STEPHEN DESALVO, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee Apple Inc. Also represented by DIVA R. HOLLIS, JOHN C. O'QUINN, JASON M. WILCOX.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

September 15, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Dodots Licensing Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 25-1263 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1263-20260915
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1263-20260915

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.