Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ligado Networks LLC v. US, No. 25-120 (Fed. Cir. May 20, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-120
Decided
May 20, 2025
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

LIGADO NETWORKS LLC,

Plaintiff-Respondent

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Petitioner

2025-120

On Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(d) from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:23-cv-01797-EJD, Senior Judge Edward J. Damich.

ON PETITION

Before LOURIE, MAYER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

The United States petitions for permission to appeal the order of the United States Court of Federal Claims granting-in-part and denying-in-part its motion to dismiss Ligado Networks LLC’s complaint. Ligado opposes the2 2 LIGADO NETWORKS LLC v. US

petition and conditionally cross-petitions for permission to appeal. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(2), the Court of Federal Claims may certify that an order that is not otherwise appealable is one involving a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. Ultimately, this court must exercise its own discretion in deciding whether to grant permission to appeal an interlocutory order. See In re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Pat. Litig., 903 F.2d 822, 822 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (applying § 1292(b)). In this case, we conclude that interlocutory review is warranted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The government’s petition for permission to appeal is granted and is transferred to the regular docket. The cross-petition is denied. The United States’s opening brief will be due within 60 days from the date of that docketing.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

May 20, 2025 Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ligado Networks LLC v. US, No. 25-120 (Fed. Cir. May 20, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-25-120-20250520
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-120-20250520

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.