Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Flypsi, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 25-1010 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1010
Decided
May 13, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FLYPSI, INC., DBA FLYP,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellee

2025-1010, 2025-1011, 2025-1012, 2025-1020, 2025-1030

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2023-00357, IPR2023-00358, IPR2023-00359, IPR2023-00360, IPR2023-00361.

JUDGMENT

BENJAMIN S. RICHARDS, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS, San Francisco, CA. DANIEL ZEILBERGER, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, MICHAEL WOLFE.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

May 13, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Flypsi, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 25-1010 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1010-20260513
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1010-20260513

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error