Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Pact XPP Schweiz AG v. Intel Corporation, No. 25-1003 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 30, 2025)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1003
Decided
January 30, 2025
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PACT XPP SCHWEIZ AG,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2025-1003

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:19-cv-01006-JDW, Judge Joshua D. Wolson.

ON MOTION

Before LOURIE, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

Agreeing that this appeal was filed prematurely, the parties jointly move for dismissal, subject to reinstatement without the payment of an additional filing fee, following entry of an order disposing of pending counterclaims. Upon consideration thereof,

22 PACT XPP SCHWEIZ AG v. INTEL CORPORATION

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. This appeal is dismissed subject, however, to reinstatement under the same docket number and without the payment of additional filing fees if, within 60 days from the date of entry of this order, appellant appeals from a final judgment in this case.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

January 30, 2025 Date ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 30, 2025

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Pact XPP Schweiz AG v. Intel Corporation, No. 25-1003 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 30, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1003-20250130
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1003-20250130

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.