Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Keysight Technologies, Inc., No. 24-2372 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2026)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PALO ALTO

NETWORKS, INC.,

Appellees

2024-2372, 2024-2373

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2023-00445, IPR2023-01329.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL J. RICHARDSON, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by AVIV S. HALPERN, Palo Alto, CA; ANDREI IANCU, Los Angeles, CA; LAURIE STEMPLER, New York, NY; JENNA FULLER, JEFFREY PRICE, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) LLP, New York, NY; JAMES R. HANNAH, Redwood Shores, CA. JONATHAN IAIN MAX DETRIXHE, Reed Smith LLP, San

2Francisco, CA, argued for all appellees. Appellee Keysight Technologies, Inc. also represented by JONAH D. MITCHELL; GERARD M. DONOVAN, Washington, DC; JAMES CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, Pittsburgh, PA. ANDREW T. RADSCH, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA, for appellee Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: