Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Lemko Corp. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 24-2336 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2026)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-2336
Decided
April 10, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

LEMKO CORP.,

Appellant

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, AFFIRMED

NETWORKS, INC.,

Appellees

2024-2336

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023-00531.

JUDGMENT

AARON M. FRANKEL, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY ENG, JENNA FULLER, JEFFREY PRICE; PAUL J. ANDRE, JAMES R. HANNAH, LISA KOBIALKA, Redwood Shores, CA. MATTHEW R. MCCULLOUGH, Winston & Strawn LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented2 by MICHAEL RUECKHEIM, King & Spalding LLP, San Francisco, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: P C (H and S , Circuit Judges, and

ER URIAM UGHES TOLL

SEEBORG, Chief District Judge1).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 10, 2026

Date

Footnotes

  1. 1 Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Lemko Corp. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 24-2336 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-2336-20260410
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-2336-20260410

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.