Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Topia Technology, Inc. v. BOX, Inc., No. 24-2218 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-2218
Decided
March 11, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TOPIA TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Appellant

v.

BOX, INC., DROPBOX, INC.,

Appellees

2024-2218, 2024-2219

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2023-00427, IPR2023-00433.

JUDGMENT

MARK BOLAND, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. WARREN LYTLE, JR., RAJA SALIBA.

LOWELL D. MEAD, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by REUBEN H. CHEN, HEIDI LYN KEEFE; SAMUEL WHITT, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CUNNINGHAM and

STARK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

March 11, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Topia Technology, Inc. v. BOX, Inc., No. 24-2218 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-2218-20260311
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-2218-20260311

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error