Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Zentian Ltd. v. Apple Inc., No. 24-2204 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2026)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-2204
Decided
June 8, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ZENTIAN LTD.,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

2024-2204

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2023-00033, IPR2023-01192.

JUDGMENT

KAYVAN B. NOROOZI, Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JESSICA R. BERNHARDT, NEVIN M. GEWERTZ, KATHERINE E. RHOADES, Bartlit Beck LLP, Chicago, IL. SETH W. LLOYD, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI; ALEXANDRA M. AVVOCATO, New York, NY; BITA RAHEBI, REBECCA WEIRES SETRAKIAN, Los Angeles, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 8, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Zentian Ltd. v. Apple Inc., No. 24-2204 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-2204-20260608
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-2204-20260608

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.