Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nike, Inc. v. Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc., No. 24-2074 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-2074
Decided
May 13, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NIKE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

LULULEMON ATHLETICA CANADA INC.,

LULULEMON USA INC.,

Appellees

2024-2074

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023-00180.

JUDGMENT

AARON PATRICK BOWLING, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL JOSEPH HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER J. RENK; MICHAEL J. SEBBA, Los Angeles, CA. BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SETH W. LLOYD; MEHRAN ARJOMAND, ALEX S. YAP, Los Angeles, CA; KYLE W.K. MOONEY, New York, NY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, STOLL, and STARK, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

May 13, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nike, Inc. v. Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc., No. 24-2074 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-2074-20260513
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-2074-20260513

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error