Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Medivis, Inc. v. Novarad Corp., No. 24-1951 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2025)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1951
Decided
December 10, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MEDIVIS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

NOVARAD CORP.,

Appellee

2024-1951

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023-00045.

JUDGMENT

ADAM STEINMETZ, Desmarais LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by BETTY H. CHEN, San Francisco, CA; TAEG SANG CHO, JOHN M. DESMARAIS, New York, NY. JOSEPH HARMER, Thorpe North & Western, LLP, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellee. Also represented by JED H. HANSEN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, CLEVENGER, and TARANTO, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

December 10, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Medivis, Inc. v. Novarad Corp., No. 24-1951 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1951-20251210
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1951-20251210

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error