Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Mozido, Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 24-1742 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1742
Decided
February 11, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MOZIDO, INC.,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

2024-1742

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-01150.

JUDGMENT

MEREDITH LEIGH MARTIN ADDY, AddyHart P.C., Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHARLES A. PANNELL, III; BENJAMIN CAPPEL, Chicago, IL; JECEACA AN, Kasowitz LLP, New York, NY; MARCUS BARBER, JOHN DOWNING, HEATHER KIM, THUCMINH NGUYEN, JONATHAN K. WALDROP, San Francisco, CA. JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by FAN ZHANG, Washington, DC; JAMES

2RICHARD BATCHELDER, Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA; CHRISTOPHER M. BONNY, Palo Alto, CA; DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Washington, DC; CASSANDRA B. ROTH, New York, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE and HU1GHES, Circuit Judges,

and KLEEH, Chief District Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

February 11, 2026

Date

Footnotes

  1. ↩ 1 Honorable Thomas S. Kleeh, Chief District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mozido, Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 24-1742 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1742-20260211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1742-20260211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error