Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Consumeron, LLC v. Maplebear Inc., No. 24-1703 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 12, 2026)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1703
Decided
January 12, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CONSUMERON, LLC,

Appellant

v.

MAPLEBEAR INC., DBA INSTACART,

Appellee

2024-1703, 2024-1704, 2024-1705, 2024-1706 Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-01356, IPR2022-01357, IPR2022-01358, IPR2022-01359.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL NOAH LERMAN, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROY T. ENGLERT, JR.; PAUL J. ANDRE, JAMES R. HANNAH, Redwood Shores, CA; JENNA FULLER, JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. ANGELA M. OLIVER, Haynes and Boone, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by SCOTT T. JARRATT, Plano, TX; DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, Dallas, TX; LAURA VU, San Francisco, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

January 12, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Consumeron, LLC v. Maplebear Inc., No. 24-1703 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 12, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1703-20260112
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1703-20260112

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.