Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ideahub Inc. v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 24-1684 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2026)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1684
Decided
April 10, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IDEAHUB INC.,

Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC,

Appellee

2024-1684

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. PGR2022-00044.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL NEWMAN, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PETER CUOMO, AMY LOBUE, JAMES M. WODARSKI.

MICHAEL QIAN, Haynes and Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, DAVID L. MCCOMBS; JONATHAN R. BOWSER, ANGELA M. OLIVER, Washington, DC; ROSHAN

2MANSINGHANI, JESSICA LEANN ANDERSEN MARKS, Unified Patents, LLC, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

and SEEBORG, Chief District Judge1).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 10, 2026

Date

Footnotes

  1. 1 Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ideahub Inc. v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 24-1684 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1684-20260410
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1684-20260410

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.