Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 24-1630 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1630
Decided
March 9, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

WAG ACQUISITION, LLC,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY,

DISNEY STREAMING SERVICES LLC, HULU, LLC,

NETFLIX, INC.,

Appellees

2024-1630

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-01411, IPR2023-00813.

JUDGMENT

RONALD ABRAMSON, Liston Abramson LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ARI JASON JAFFESS.

EAMONN GARDNER, Cooley LLP, Denver, CO, argued for all appellees. Appellee Google LLC also represented by ORION ARMON; HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Palo Alto, CA.

2STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, for appellees Walt Disney Company, Disney Streaming Services LLC, Hulu, LLC, Netflix, Inc. Also represented by LARISSA S. BIFANO, Boston, MA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

March 9, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 24-1630 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1630-20260309
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1630-20260309

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error