Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Perdiemco LLC v. Nextraq LLC, No. 24-1621 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2026)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1621
Decided
May 15, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PERDIEMCO LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NEXTRAQ LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2024-1621

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in No. 1:23-cv-00193-MHC, Judge Mark H. Cohen.

JUDGMENT

MEREDITH LEIGH MARTIN ADDY, AddyHart P.C., Atlanta, GA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by CHARLES A. PANNELL, III; BENJAMIN CAPPEL, Chicago, IL.

JUSTIN J. OLIVER, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN D. MURNANE, New York, NY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

May 15, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Perdiemco LLC v. Nextraq LLC, No. 24-1621 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1621-20260515
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1621-20260515

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.