Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Gesture Technology Partners, LLC, No. 24-1585 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2025)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1585
Decided
October 16, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC,

Appellant 2024-1585

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/014,902.

JUDGMENT

JOHN WITTENZELLNER, Williams Simons & Landis PLLC, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by FRED WILLIAMS, Austin, TX. JUSTIN BOVA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee John A. Squires. Also represented by NICHOLAS THEODORE MATICH, IV, PETER JOHN SAWERT.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

October 16, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Gesture Technology Partners, LLC, No. 24-1585 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1585-20251016
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1585-20251016

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error