Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Largan Precision Co., Ltd. v. Motorola Mobility LLC, No. 24-1540 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1540
Decided
September 4, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit LARGAN PRECISION CO., LTD.,

Appellant

v.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,

Appellee

2024-1540

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-01156.

JUDGMENT

KEVIN RUSSELL, Russell & Woofter LLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. SARAH ELISABETH JELSEMA, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by ANDREW M. MASON, FRANK MORTON-PARK, JOHN D. VANDENBERG.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

September 4, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Largan Precision Co., Ltd. v. Motorola Mobility LLC, No. 24-1540 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1540-20250904
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1540-20250904

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.