Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Apple Inc. v. LBT IP I LLC, No. 24-1508 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2026)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1508
Decided
February 6, 2026
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APPLE INC.,

Appellant

v.

LBT IP I LLC,

Appellee

2024-1508

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01189.

JUDGMENT

JAYSEN CHUNG, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRIAN ROSENTHAL, New York, NY; JULIA G. TABAT, Dallas, TX; JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS. BRIAN SHERWOOD SEAL, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by SHAUN DARRELL GREGORY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, TARANTO and

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

February 6, 2026

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Apple Inc. v. LBT IP I LLC, No. 24-1508 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2026).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1508-20260206
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1508-20260206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error