Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Envirotainer AB v. Doubleday Acquisitions, LLC, No. 24-1420 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1420
Decided
October 9, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ENVIROTAINER AB,

Appellant

v.

DOUBLEDAY ACQUISITIONS, LLC,

Cross-Appellant

2024-1420, 2024-1421, 2024-1422, 2024-1425, 2024-1445,

2024-1452, 2024-1455, 2024-1444

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-00292, IPR2022-00293, IPR2022-00851, IPR2022-00864.

JUDGMENT

KIRK T. BRADLEY, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for appellant. Also represented by WESLEY ACHEY, CARTER BABAZ, MATTHEW WOLFF HOWELL, Atlanta, GA; ANDREW JAMES LIGOTTI, New York, NY. ROBERT COUNIHAN, Fenwick & West LLP, New York, NY, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by RYAN HADDAD, NICHOLAS KLENOW, KEVIN MCGANN; JENNIFER RENE BUSH, Mountain View, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

October 9, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Envirotainer AB v. Doubleday Acquisitions, LLC, No. 24-1420 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1420-20251009
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1420-20251009

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.