Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Dynatemp International, Inc. v. RMS of Georgia, LLC, No. 24-142 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 30, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-142
Decided
September 30, 2024
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DYNATEMP INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

FLUOROFUSION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INC., HAROLD B. KIVLAN, IV, WILLIAM GRESHAM,

DAVID COUCHOT,

Plaintiffs-Respondents

v.

RMS OF GEORGIA, LLC, dba Choice Refrigerants, R421A, LLC, KENNETH M. PONDER,

Defendants-Petitioners

2024-142

On Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b) from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in No. 5:20-cv-00142-FL, Judge Louise Wood Flanagan.

ON PETITION

Before DYK, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

22 DYNATEMP INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. RMS OF GEORGIA, LLC

RMS of Georgia, LLC, R421A, LLC, and Kenneth M. Ponder (collectively, “RMS”) petition for permission to appeal an order of the district court determining the scope of waiver created by reliance on an advice-of-counsel defense. The court certified the order for appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Dynatemp International, Inc., Fluorofusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Harold B. Kivlan, IV, William Gresham, and David Couchot oppose the petition. Under § 1292(b), a district court may certify that an order that is not otherwise appealable is one involving a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. Ultimately, this court must exercise its own discretion in deciding whether to grant permission to appeal an interlocutory order. See In re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Pat. Litig., 903 F.2d 822, 822 (Fed. Cir. 1990). In this case, we conclude that an interlocutory appeal under § 1292(b) is not appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition for permission to appeal is denied.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

September 30, 2024 Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Dynatemp International, Inc. v. RMS of Georgia, LLC, No. 24-142 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 30, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-24-142-20240930
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-142-20240930

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.