Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Arsus, LLC v. Tesla, Inc., No. 24-1344 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2025)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1344
Decided
July 10, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ARSUS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

TESLA, INC.,

Appellee

2024-1344

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-01216.

JUDGMENT

PATRICK BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. ASHRAF FAWZY, Tesla, Inc., Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by PAUL ISAAC MARGULIES; KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Palo Alto, CA; MICHAEL TIMOTHY HAWKINS, Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneapolis, MN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (HUGHES and STARK, Circuit Judges,

and WANG, District Judge1).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

July 10, 2025

Date

Footnotes

  1. ↩ 1 The Honorable Nina Y. Wang, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Arsus, LLC v. Tesla, Inc., No. 24-1344 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1344-20250710
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1344-20250710

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error