Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Flygrip, Inc. v. Popsockets LLC, No. 24-1310 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2025)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1310
Decided
October 9, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FLYGRIP, INC.,

Appellant

v.

POPSOCKETS LLC,

Appellee

2024-1310, 2024-1311

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-00937, IPR2022-00938.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY J. GONSALVES, Law Office of Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT KATZ, Katz PLLC, Dallas, TX. IAN WASHBURN, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by LUCAS OXENFORD; JONATHAN M. LINDSAY, Newport Beach, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST and

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

October 9, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Flygrip, Inc. v. Popsockets LLC, No. 24-1310 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1310-20251009
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1310-20251009

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error