Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc., No. 24-1282 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2024)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1282
Decided
January 24, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL

DRILLING CO., HELMERICH & PAYNE

TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, MOTIVE DRILLING

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

NABORS DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2024-1282

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in No. 3:20-cv-03126-M, Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn.

ON MOTION

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,

22 HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO. v. NABORS

DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

January 24, 2024 Date ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 24, 2024

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc., No. 24-1282 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1282-20240124
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1282-20240124

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.