Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Adhami, No. 24-1218 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2025)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1218
Decided
July 16, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: EFTIM JOSIF ADHAMI,

Appellant 2024-1218

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/480,105.

JUDGMENT

MARTIN S. HIGH, Martin S. High, P.C., Clemson, SC, argued for appellant. MARY L. KELLY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Coke Morgan Stewart. Also represented by AMY J. NELSON, SHEHLA WYNNE.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (LOURIE and PROST, Circuit Judges, and

BUMB, Chief District Judge1).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

July 16, 2025

Date

Footnotes

  1. ↩ 1 Honorable Renée Marie Bumb, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Adhami, No. 24-1218 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1218-20250716
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1218-20250716

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error