NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
ASK SYDNEY, LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SNAP INC.,
Defendant-Appellee
2024-1157
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:23-cv-06298-MCSBFM, Judge Mark C. Scarsi.
JUDGMENT
ERIK LUND, DNL Zito, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH J. ZITO. EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KELLY CATHERINE HUNSAKER, Redwood City, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
ASK Sydney, LLC v. Snap Inc., No. 24-1157 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2025).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.
