Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Surfcast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 24-1156 (Fed. Cir. June 4, 2025)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1156
Decided
June 4, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SURFCAST, INC.,

Appellant

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Appellee

2024-1156, 2024-1160, 2024-1161, 2024-1162 Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-00423, IPR2022-00590, IPR2022-00591, IPR2022-00592.

JUDGMENT

BRIAN SHERWOOD SEAL, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by SHAUN DARRELL GREGORY; JASON A. HOUDEK, Indianapolis, IN. JOSHUA JOHN FOUGERE, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 4, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Surfcast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 24-1156 (Fed. Cir. June 4, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1156-20250604
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1156-20250604

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error