Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

MHL Custom, Inc. v. Waydoo USA, Inc., No. 24-1036 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2024)

Granted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1036
Decided
April 30, 2024
Judge
Wallach, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MHL CUSTOM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WAYDOO USA, INC., SHENZHEN WAYDOO

INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,

Defendants-Appellants

2024-1036

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:21-cv-00091-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

ON MOTION

Before DYK, WALLACH, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.

WALLACH, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

Waydoo USA, Inc. and Shenzhen Waydoo Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Waydoo”) move to dismiss their appeal. MHL Custom, Inc. opposes the motion. Waydoo replies.

22 MHL CUSTOM, INC. v. WAYDOO USA, INC.

We grant the motion because we agree that the judgment is non-final. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The stay is lifted. (2) The motion to dismiss is granted. (3) Each party shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 30, 2024 Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MHL Custom, Inc. v. Waydoo USA, Inc., No. 24-1036 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-24-1036-20240430
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-24-1036-20240430

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error