Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

CTD Networks, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 23-2428 (Fed. Cir. May 24, 2024)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2428
Decided
May 24, 2024
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CTD NETWORKS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2023-2428

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 6:22-cv-01042-XR, Judge Xavier Rodriguez.

Before LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

This appeal arises out of the district court’s final judgment dismissing CTD Networks, LLC’s infringement claims against Google LLC. In December 2023, William P. Ramey and Ramey LLP (collectively, “Ramey”) moved to withdraw as counsel for CTD. On February 2, 2024, this court ordered that Ramey’s motion would be granted if new2 2 CTD NETWORKS, LLC v. GOOGLE LLC

counsel filed an entry of appearance on behalf of CTD, ECF No. 26. But no entry of appearance has been entered.1

Having considered the motion and the status reports, we dismiss. Ramey has informed the court that “CTD has abandoned the appeal.” ECF No. 27 at 6. While Ramey opposes dismissal to protect its own interests against potential liability that could arise out of a sanctions motion pending before the district court, we have been shown no basis for allowing Ramey to appeal when it is not a party and has not been sanctioned or otherwise the direct subject of a court order. See Nisus Corp. v. Perma-Chink Sys., Inc., 497 F.3d 1316, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2007); United States v. Carter, 995 F.3d 1214, 1218 (10th Cir. 2021) (noting that “attorneys have standing to appeal only when . . . they are specific objects of the challenged order” (cleaned up)).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

May 24, 2024

Date

Footnotes

  1. 1 Whitestone Law, which filed a notice of appearance at the district court on behalf of CTD, has indicated it will not enter an appearance in this appeal. ECF No. 29.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CTD Networks, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 23-2428 (Fed. Cir. May 24, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-2428-20240524
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-2428-20240524

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.