NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
SYDNEXIS, INC.,
Appellant
v.
EYENOVIA, INC.,
Appellee
2023-2402, 2023-2403, 2023-2411
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-00384, IPR2022-00414, IPR2022-00415.
JUDGMENT
MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAD ALLEN MILLS; KELSEY CATINA, RICHARD TORCZON, Washington, DC. THOMAS H. WINTNER, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PETER CUOMO, WILLIAMS DIXON.
2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 12, 2025
Date