Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 23-2296 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2296
Decided
March 6, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PARUS HOLDINGS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellee

2023-2296, 2023-2297

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-00358, IPR2022-00523.

JUDGMENT

JOHN BRUCE CAMPBELL, McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOEL LANCE THOLLANDER; SCOTT W. HEJNY, Dallas, TX. BENJAMIN HABER, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by WILLIAM FINK, Washington, DC; CAITLIN P. HOGAN, New York, NY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

March 6, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 23-2296 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-23-2296-20250306
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-2296-20250306

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.