Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Agis Software Development LLC v. Stewart, No. 23-2236 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2236
Decided
June 9, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,

Appellant

v.

COKE MORGAN STEWART, ACTING UNDER

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ACTING

DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT

AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2023-2236, 2023-2237

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-00513, IPR2022-00514, IPR2022-00515.

JUDGMENT

ENRIQUE WILLIAM ITURRALDE, Fabricant LLP, Rye, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALFRED ROSS FABRICANT, PETER LAMBRIANAKOS, VINCENT J. RUBINO, III. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for

2intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, AMY J. NELSON, BRIAN RACILLA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

BRYSON, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 9, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Agis Software Development LLC v. Stewart, No. 23-2236 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-23-2236-20250609
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-2236-20250609

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.