Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Voxx International Corp. v. Southwest Dealer Services Inc., No. 23-2215 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 3, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2215
Decided
December 3, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SOUTHWEST DEALER SERVICES INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2023-2215

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:23-cv-00350-GW-MAA, Judge George H. Wu.

JUDGMENT

RYAN SANTURRI, Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, PA, Orlando, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by BRIAN R. GILCHRIST. PATRICK A. LUJIN, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARY PEAL, EMILY SOSOLIK, BASIL TRENT WEBB. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CHEN, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

December 3, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Voxx International Corp. v. Southwest Dealer Services Inc., No. 23-2215 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 3, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-2215-20241203
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-2215-20241203

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error