Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Google LLC, No. 23-2119 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 5, 2025)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2119
Decided
February 5, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: GOOGLE LLC,

Appellant 2023-2119

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/394,586.

JUDGMENT

ARTHUR JOHN ARGALL, III, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANDREW V. TRASK, MICHAEL THOMAS ZAKRAJSEK. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Coke Morgan Stewart. Also represented by MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

February 5, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Google LLC, No. 23-2119 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 5, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-23-2119-20250205
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-2119-20250205

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error