Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Phoji, Inc. v. Atlassian US, Inc., No. 23-2107 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2107
Decided
November 13, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PHOJI, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ATLASSIAN US, INC., FKA ATLASSIAN, INC.,

Appellee

2023-2107

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-00210.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH T. MIOTKE, DeWitt LLP, Brookfield, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by ERIC HUGH CHADWICK, BRADLEY J. THORSON, Minneapolis, MN. JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by WINSTON LIAW.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 13, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Phoji, Inc. v. Atlassian US, Inc., No. 23-2107 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-2107-20241113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-2107-20241113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.