Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ward Participations B.V. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 23-2080 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2080
Decided
January 13, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WARD PARTICIPATIONS B.V.,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., BANK OF

AMERICA, N.A.,

Appellees

2023-2080, 2023-2081, 2023-2082

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-00113, IPR2022-00114, IPR2022-01076, IPR2022-01077, PGR2022-00007.

JUDGMENT

ERIK LUND, DNL Zito, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH J. ZITO. ASHLEY BOLT, Fish & Richardson P.C., Atlanta, GA, argued for all appellees. Appellee Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. also represented by PETER HONG, THAD CHARLES KODISH, BENJAMIN THOMPSON.

2WILLIAM FINK, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee Bank of America, N.A. Also represented by BENJAMIN HABER, Los Angeles, CA; MARC JOSEPH PENSABENE, New York, NY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

January 13, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ward Participations B.V. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 23-2080 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-23-2080-20250113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-2080-20250113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.