Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Boxcast Inc. v. Resi Media LLC, No. 23-2078 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2078
Decided
November 5, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BOXCAST INC.,

Appellant

v.

RESI MEDIA LLC,

Appellee

2023-2078

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-00066.

JUDGMENT

JOSHUA FRIEDMAN, Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARK MCDOUGALL.

SANFORD IAN WEISBURST, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN MACK, San Francisco, CA; JOSEPH M. PAUNOVICH, Los Angeles, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 5, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Boxcast Inc. v. Resi Media LLC, No. 23-2078 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-2078-20241105
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-2078-20241105

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.