Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Shell USA, Inc. v. Scientific Design LLC, No. 23-1937 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1937
Decided
February 7, 2025
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SHELL USA, INC., FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

SCIENTIFIC DESIGN LLC, FKA SCIENTIFIC

DESIGN CO., INC.,

Appellee

2023-1937, 2023-1938, 2023-1939

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-01537, IPR2022-00158, IPR2022-00159.

JUDGMENT

NATHAN R. SPEED, Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RICHARD F. GIUNTA, GERALD B. HRYCYSZYN.

CATHERINE EMILY STETSON, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CELINE JIMENEZ CROWSON, WILLIAM HAVEMANN, NICHOLAS ROTZ; JOHANNAH CASSEL-WALKER, San Francisco, CA;

2BENJAMIN C. HSING, Venable LLP, New York, NY; JUSTIN J. OLIVER, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

February 7, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Shell USA, Inc. v. Scientific Design LLC, No. 23-1937 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1937-20250207
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1937-20250207

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.