Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Vivint, Inc. v. ADT LLC, No. 23-1787 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1787
Decided
October 15, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VIVINT, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ADT LLC, ALARM.COM INC.,

Appellees

2023-1787

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-01374, IPR2022-00714.

JUDGMENT

LANNIE REX SEARS, Maschoff Brennan, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by STERLING A. BRENNAN, Irvine, CA; ROBERT PARRISH FREEMAN, JR., ERIC MASCHOFF, Park City, UT. SHARONMOYEE GOSWAMI, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY, argued for ADT LLC. Appellees Also represented by KEITH HUMMEL.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

October 15, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Vivint, Inc. v. ADT LLC, No. 23-1787 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1787-20241015
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1787-20241015

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.